Isothermal urea denaturation monitored by CD spectroscopy

JP Juan Luis Pacheco-García
DL Dmitry S. Loginov
AN Athi N. Naganathan
PV Pavla Vankova
MC Mario Cano-Muñoz
PM Petr Man
AP Angel L. Pey
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Urea was prepared at ~ 6 M in 20 mM HEPES–NaOH, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), pH 7.4 and its actual concentration was determined by refractive index measurements. Urea stock solutions were mixed with hPGK1 solutions in 20 mM HEPES–NaOH, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM β-ME, pH 7.4 to a final concentration of 5 μM (in protein) and 0–5 M (in urea). Samples were incubated for at least 2 h and denaturation experiments were monitored by Far-UV CD spectroscopy similarly to those described in Section "Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy". but restricting the acquisition range to 215–260 nm.

Data at 222 nm were used for fittings assuming a two-state model (apparently valid for WT hPGK1 using different conformational probes) 3,2830 to provide the values of experimental equilibrium m (murea) and Cm (concentration of urea at which half-denaturation occurs) using Eq. (6):

where S is the experimental CD signal as a function of the [urea], SN and SU are the fitted CD signals for the Native and Unfolded state baselines at 0 M urea, respectively, mN and mU are the slopes of the native and unfolded state baselines, murea describes the unfolding cooperativity, R is the ideal gas constant and T is the experimental temperature (298.15 K). Although this model is likely an oversimplification, it provides a proxy to compare the cooperativity of reversible chemical unfolding of hPGK1 variants.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A