The improvements in MF and MIR were analyzed first using the paired Student t test; then, the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons was used to assess the mean improvement in MF and MIR at 45°, 70°, and 90° of flexion in the St5°, St10°, and Complex5° groups. The differences in improvement in MF and MIR at each flexion angle in each single-dimensional change (St, Ar, and Ct) of 5° or 10° were also assessed using the paired Student t test and the Bonferroni test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP PRO 15.0.0 software (SAS Institute Inc).
A post hoc power analysis with an effect size of 0.5 was performed as described by Cohen 6 ; the inclusion of 43 hips indicated a power of 0.74 with α = .05, which was considered a suitable sample size. The posterior power was calculated using G*Power, Version 3.1.9.6. 10
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.