4.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

MH Mina Hirose
MA Meiji Soe Aung
YF Yusuke Fujita
TK Taisei Kato
YH Yukito Hirose
SY Shoko Yahata
AF Atsushi Fukuda
MS Masato Saitoh
NU Noriko Urushibara
NK Nobumichi Kobayashi
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For all the isolates, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) within limited ranges were measured by the broth microdilution test using Dry Plate Eiken DP32 (Eiken, Tokyo, Japan) for 18 antimicrobials: oxacillin (OXA), ampicillin (AMP), cefazolin (CFZ), cefmetazole (CMZ), flomoxef (FMX), imipenem (IPM), gentamicin (GEN), arbekacin (ABK), erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CLI), vancomycin (VAN), teicoplanin (TEC), linezolid (LZD), minocycline (MIN), fosfomycin (FOF), levofloxacin (LVX), cefoxitin (FOX) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Inducible clindamycin resistance (CLI-i) was determined by the D-zone test. Resistance was judged according to break points mentioned in the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards [53] for most of the antimicrobials tested. For antimicrobial drugs whose breakpoints are not available in CLSI standards, we employed the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoint for FOF (32 mg/L, Staphylococcus spp.) [54], and a unique breakpoint for ABK (4 mg/L which is higher than the 2 mg/L, defined by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy for respiratory infection), and a breakpoint of FMX (16 mg/L) defined by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy for urinary tract infection [55].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A