Negative symptoms were assessed using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).18 We used first-order (avolition, anhedonia or apathy, flat affect, and alogia) and second-order (experiential and expressive) factors in analyses. First-order factors used global scores corresponding to each domain, and second-order factors were calculated using the mean of global scores. SANS items were scored on a 0 to 5 scale, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Attention items were not included. Positive symptoms were assessed using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS).19 The SAPS measures 4 domains on the same 0 to 5 scale: hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, and thought disorder.
The Role Functioning Scale (RFS)20 assessed 4 interviewer-rated role functions: work functioning, independent living and self-care, family relationships, and immediate social network relationships. All RFS items were rated initially on a 1 to 7 scale, with higher score indicating better functioning. However, to aid in interpretation and consistency with symptom scales, all RFS ratings were reverse scored so that higher scores indicated worse functioning.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.