Glucose uptake assay

BP Brijesh B. Patel
EA Ellen Ackerstaff
IS Inna S. Serganova
JK John E. Kerrigan
RB Ronald G. Blasberg
JK Jason A. Koutcher
DB Debabrata Banerjee
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Seventy-five thousand MSCs, CAFs, or MDA-MB-231 cells per well were seeded into 12-well plates. After attachment and growth for 24 h (Fig. 1C) to 48 h (Fig. 2C and and6E),6E), cells were washed once with 1 mL PBS and incubated for 1 h with 0.025 μCi [U-14C]-D-glucose in 200 μL glucose uptake buffer (GUB: 120 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM MgSO4-7 hydrate, 70 μM CaCl2-dihydrate, pH 7.4) per well at 37°C and 5% CO2. For experiments, studying the effects of a flavonoid on glucose uptake (Fig. 6E), 100 μM phloretin was added to GUB. All cells were subsequently washed with 500 μL ice-cold GUB to stop transport. Cells were then exposed to 200 μL 0.25% Trypsin / 0.53 mM EDTA per well for 15 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO2. The entire content of each well was placed into scintillation liquid and counted in a scintillation counter to generate counts per minute (CPM). Where appropriate (Fig. 1C), CPM was normalized to 100,000 cells. In co-culture experiments (Fig. 4B), 5•104 MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded into the chambers of a Boyden chamber plate and 1•105 MDA-MB-231 cells or CAFs were seeded into the inserts. Cells were co-cultured for 2 weeks, after which MDA-MB-231 cells in chambers were assayed to determine glucose uptake as described above.

Lactate oxidation metabolite (LOM)-mediated growth of MDA-MB-231 cells – Modulation of MDA-MB-231 cell growth in the absence or presence of 2.5 mM glucose (Gluc) by 2.5 mM of (A) α-alanine (α-Ala), β-alanine (β-Ala), GABA, acetate (Acet) or (B) by 2.5 mM pyruvate (sodium pyruvate). Compared to control cells exposed to culture medium without glucose and added nutrients (Dep), neither GABA, alanine or acetate produced a significant growth benefit for MDA-MB-231 cells; While α-alanine appears to increase cell growth in the presence of 2.5 mM glucose, GABA, β-alanine, and acetate abrogate the growth benefit of 2.5 mM glucose, as seen in (A, B). Glucose alone (B) and pyruvate alone (B) enhanced MDA-MB-231 cell growth similarly, while both together enhanced growth synergistically (B). (C) Pyruvate does not modulate glucose uptake in MDA-MB-231 cells (over a range of 1.25 mM to 5 mM). Data are displayed as mean±SD (n = 3 for A, B and n = 4 for C); * p<0.05, ** p<0.005, *** p<0.0005 by two-tailed, unpaired, unequal variance Student’s T-test (compared to Dep or as indicated by lines between subgroups).

Conditioned medium from CAFs (CCM) influences 14C-pyruvate (A) and 14C-glucose uptake (B) in MDA-MB-231 cells (MDAs). Data are displayed as mean±SD (n=4 for A and n=3 for B); ** p=0.005, *** p<0.0005 by two-tailed, unpaired, unequal variance Student’s T-test (compared to MDAs).

Phloretin as a potential inhibitor of tumor-TME metabolic coupling – (A) Left panel: Electrostatic potential map of solvent accessible surface area of MCT1. Site A = positive electrostatic potential, Site B = negative electrostatic potential; Right panel: 3D model of Phloretin binding to Site B (Eint = −50.7 kcal/mol). (B) Growth inhibitory profile of flavonoids in MDA-MB-231 cells in response to 24 h exposure to 100 μM of indicated drug. (C) Phloretin inhibits 14C-lactate uptake in MSC and CAFs. (D) Phloretin inhibits 14C-pyruvate uptake in MDA-MB-231 cells. (E) Phloretin inhibits 14C-D-glucose uptake in MDA-MB-231 cells. 14C-L-glucose was used as a negative control. (F) Phloretin decreases ROS accumulation in MDA-MB-231 cells and protects from the ROS accumulation effects of H2O2exposure. (G) Phloretin attenuates MDA-MB-231 cell growth in CCM. The glucose concentrations at the start of the experiments were 21 mM and 11 mM for complete medium (Comp Media) and CCM, respectively. In B (n=3), C (n=4), D (n=4), E (n=4), F (n=6), and G (n=3) data are displayed as mean±SD; * p<0.05, ** p≤0.005, *** p<0.0005, **** p<0.0001 by two-tailed, unpaired, unequal variance Student’s T-test for the comparison to corresponding controls (“Untreated”, no line) and comparisons as indicated by line.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A