Following the instructions of the manufacturer, 100 µM of FAM122AID(S120C) (or variants) or ARPP19(S10C) was labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 C5 Maleimide (ThermoFisher) using 1:10 protein to fluorophore ratio. The mixture was incubated for 2 h in the dark at room temperature at pH 7.0 and excess β-mercaptoethanol (1.2× the concentration of the fluorophore) was added to inactivate any unreacted Alexa Fluor 488. Labelled FAM122AID(S120C) (or variants) or ARPP19(S10C) was recovered by analytical SEC (Superdex 75 Increase 10/300 (Cytiva)) and used for the fluorescence polarization assays. The labelled FAM122AID(S120C) (or variants) or ARPP19(S10C) are hereafter referred to as FAM122AID-tracer, or ARPP19-tracer.
The fluorescence polarization assays were standardized using black 384-well low volume round bottom microplates (Corning, 4411) with 15 µl solution per well. The measurements were performed using a CLARIOstarPlus (BMG LABTECH Inc) microplate reader (using reader control software version 5.7 R2) set up to 482 ± 16 nm excitation, 530 ± 40 nm emission, and dichroic long pass filter 504 nm with reflection ranging between 380–497 nm and transmission ranging between 508–850 nm. For the dissociation constant (Kd) binding measurements, all dilutions were made into fluorescence polarization buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP, 0.01% Triton X-100, 0.1 mg ml−1 BSA). A predilution of FAM122AID-tracer/ARPP19-tracer was prepared for 0.3 nM and a serial dilution of PP2A:B55 was made at 3 times the final concentration. Five microlitres of FAM122AID-tracer/ARPP19-tracer, 5 µl of serially diluted PP2A:B55 complex and 5 µl of fluorescence polarization buffer were distributed into the 384-well microplate, resulting in a 0.1 nM final concentration of FAM122AID-tracer or ARPP19-tracer. All assay experiments were repeated in triplicate and incubated for 30 min in the dark and sealed at room temperature before reading. The experiments were independently repeated ≥3 times and the averaged Kd and s.d. values were reported. The data was evaluated using GraphPad Prism 9.5.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.