Assessment of the head-twitch response

JW Jason Wallach
AC Andrew B. Cao
MC Maggie M. Calkins
AH Andrew J. Heim
JL Janelle K. Lanham
EB Emma M. Bonniwell
JH Joseph J. Hennessey
HB Hailey A. Bock
EA Emilie I. Anderson
AS Alexander M. Sherwood
HM Hamilton Morris
RK Robbin de Klein
AK Adam K. Klein
BC Bruna Cuccurazzu
JG James Gamrat
TF Tilka Fannana
RZ Randy Zauhar
AH Adam L. Halberstadt
JM John D. McCorvy
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The head-twitch response (HTR) was assessed using a head-mounted neodymium magnet and a magnetometer detection coil78. The mice were allowed to recover from the magnet implantation surgeries for at least 1 week prior to behavioral testing. Mice were tested in multiple HTR experiments, with at least 7 days between studies to avoid carryover effects. HTR experiments were conducted in a well-lit room, and the mice were allowed to habituate to the room for at least 1 h prior to testing. Mice were tested in a 12.5-cm diameter glass cylinder surrounded by a magnetometer coil. Coil voltage was low-pass filtered (2 kHz), amplified, and digitized (20-kHz sampling rate) using a Powerlab (model /8SP or 8/35) with LabChart software (ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA). Head twitches were identified in the recordings off-line by their waveform characteristics94 or using artificial intelligence95. HTR counts were analyzed using one-way ANOVAs or one-way Welch ANOVAs (in cases where groups showed unequal variances). Tukey’s test or Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test was used for post hoc comparisons. Significance was demonstrated by surpassing an α level of 0.05. Median effective doses (ED50 values) and 95% confidence intervals for dose-response experiments were calculated by nonlinear regression (Prism 9.02, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A