2.4. Flow cytometric analyses

LP Lisa Prickler
UB Ulrike Baranyi
KM Konstantinos Mengrelis
AW Anna Marianne Weijler
VK Verena Kainz
BK Bernhard Kratzer
RS Romy Steiner
JM Jasmin Mucha
ER Elisa Rudoph
NP Nina Pilat
BB Barbara Bohle
HS Herbert Strobl
WP Winfried Franz Pickl
RV Rudolf Valenta
BL Birgit Linhart
TW Thomas Wekerle
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To detect Phl p 5+/GFP-expressing CD19+ B cells, flow cytometric analyses were performed. The percentage of Phl p 5+ cells was calculated by subtracting the number of positive events observed in control staining from those quadrants containing Phl p 5+ and Phl p 5- cells expressing a CD19+ marker and by dividing the net percentage of Phl p 5+ cells by the total net percentage of Phl p 5+ plus Phl p 5- CD19+ B cells as described (33). Phl p 5-specific polyclonal antibodies were purified from rabbit serum raised against rPhl p 5 on a HiTrap Protein G HP antibody purification column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polyclonal anti-Phl p 5 IgG was used as the primary antibody and developed by counterstaining with PE donkey anti-rabbit IgG. 7AAD (Viability Staining Solution, BioLegend, San Diego, USA) was used to exclude dead cells. CD19-APC-Cy7 (clone: 6D5) and CD11b-PE (clone: M1/70) were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, USA). CD4-PE-Cy7 (clone: GK1.5), CD45.2-eFluor500 (clone: 104), and CD3- eFluor450 (clone: 17A2) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA, USA). CD8-APC (clone: 53-6-7) and CD45.2-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone: 104) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, USA). Flow cytometric analyses were performed using a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10.7.2.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A