LC–MS3 analysis of DSSO cross-linked peptides

KM Kamal Mandal
GW Gianina Wicaksono
CY Clinton Yu
JA Jarrett J. Adams
MH Michael R. Hoopmann
WT William C. Temple
AI Adila Izgutdina
BE Bonell Patiño Escobar
MG Maryna Gorelik
CI Christian H. Ihling
MN Matthew A. Nix
AN Akul Naik
WX William H. Xie
JH Juwita Hübner
LR Lisa A. Rollins
SR Sandy M. Reid
ER Emilio Ramos
CK Corynn Kasap
VS Veronica Steri
JS Juan Antonio Camara Serrano
FS Fernando Salangsang
PP Paul Phojanakong
MM Melanie McMillan
VG Victor Gavallos
AL Andrew D. Leavitt
AL Aaron C. Logan
CR Cliona M. Rooney
JE Justin Eyquem
AS Andrea Sinz
BH Benjamin J. Huang
ES Elliot Stieglitz
CS Catherine C. Smith
RM Robert L. Moritz
SS Sachdev S. Sidhu
LH Lan Huang
AW Arun P. Wiita
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The SEC–HpHt fractions were subjected to LC–MS3 analysis using an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano-HPLC system coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific), as described previously23. Peptides were separated by reversed-phase LC (50 cm × 75 μm Acclaim PepMap C18 column, Thermo Scientific) with over an 87-min gradient of ACN (4% to 25%) at a flow rate of 300 nl min–1. Initial survey (MS1) scans were measured in the Orbitrap with a scan range from 375 to 1,800 m/z, a resolution of 60,000 FWHM and an AGC target of 4 × 105 with a maximum injection time of 75 ms at top speed per 4 s of cycle time. Ions with a charge of 4+ or greater were selected for MS2 and subjected to fragmentation using collision-induced dissociation with a normalized collision energy of 23%. For MS2 scans, the scan range was set to auto mode, with a resolution of 30,000 FWHM, an AGC target of 5 × 104, a precursor isolation width of 1.6 m/z and a maximum injection time of 100 ms. A targeted inclusion on ions with a mass difference corresponding to the difference in alkene and thiol DSSO fragments (31.9721 Da) was used to select precursors for MS3 analysis. For MS3 scans, higher collision-induced dissociation was used with a normalized collision energy of 28%, the AGC target was set to 2 × 104, and the maximum injection time was set to 125 ms.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A