GDT_TS scores were computed using backbone Cα atoms within the Comparison Residue Ranges, using the representative medoid model [27, 38] of the NMR model ensemble and the first-ranked AF2 model from the set of prediction models, by the method of Zemla [39], using the TMScore program [40] (downloaded from https://zhanggroup.org/TM-score/), as
Here, , and are the percent of residues with backbone Cα RMSD’s < 1 Å, < 2Å, < 4 Å, and < 8 Å, respectively, for consensus reliably modeled / well-define residue ranges of the superimposed structure pairs. would mean that all reliably-modeled residues superimpose with backbone Cα RMSD < 1 Å; while of 50% corresponds to an average backbone RMSD of about 4 Å. For brevity, scores are referred to throughout this paper as GDT scores and are reported as real numbers between 0 (0%) and 1.0 (100%).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.