2.8. EMG and force recordings

CV Carolina Vila-Chã
AB Antonio Bovolini
CF Cristiana Francisco
AC Ana R. Costa-Brito
CV Cláudia Vaz
MR María Rua-Alonso
JP José Antonio de Paz
TV Taian Vieira
GM Goncalo V. Mendonca
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Surface EMG signals were acquired from the VM and BF muscles during the dynamic balance and isometric tasks used to measure the different muscle strength profiles. Signals from the selected muscles were recorded with three pairs Ag-AgCl electrodes (Ambu Neuroline, Denmark; conductive area 28 mm2), placed as recommended by Hermens et al. (29). Before placement of the electrodes, the skin was shaved, lightly abraded, and cleansed with water. A ground electrode was placed around the ankle of the dominant lower limb. Surface EMG signals were amplified as bipolar derivations (EMG amplifier, OT Bioelettronica, Turin, Italy), band-pass filtered (−3 dB bandwidth, 10–500 Hz), sampled at 2048 samples/s, and converted to digital data by a 12-bit A/D converter board. The EMG electrodes remained in place during the exercise session and were used for all EMG measurements on the same day (before and immediately after training). At the end of the experiment, the electrodes were removed, and the electrode positions were marked on the skin to ensure that the electrodes were placed in the same location for the EMG recordings obtained 24 h after training. The force signals were measured with a load cell (load sensitivity = 0.0048 V/N; SENSOR, load cell 614, United Kingdom) and collected through an auxiliary channel of the EMG amplifier (OT Bioelettronica, Italy), sampled at 2048 samples/s, and converted to digital data by a 12-bit A/D converter board and recorded in the OT Biolab software (OT Bioelettronica, Italy), thus allowing the simultaneous collection of force and EMG signals.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A