2.3.4. Ground truth: segmentation of MS lesion

HS Haykel Snoussi
JC Julien Cohen‐Adad
BC Benoît Combès
ÉB Élise Bannier
ST Slimane Tounekti
AK Anne Kerbrat
CB Christian Barillot
EC Emmanuel Caruyer
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For the 53 MS patients, MS lesions were manually segmented by 9 raters, including radiologists and experienced readers, as described in Eden et al. (2019). Briefly, MS lesions were segmented using both axial T2 and sagittal T2‐weighted images with ITK‐SNAP Toolbox 3.6.0 (Yushkevich et al., 2006). From these lesion masks, we computed for each vertebral level: (i) the number of MS lesions within the vertebral level and (ii) the total lesion volume normalized by the volume of the corresponding vertebral level. In Figure 2, we represent the quantity and distribution of lesion volumes in the [C2‐C4] and [C1–C7] regions.

Left: Distribution of multiple sclerosis (MS) within our MS cohorts. Right: Distribution of lesion's volume in [C2–C4] region. The y‐axis shows the number of segmented lesions in [C2–C4] regions, whereas the x‐axis represents the threshold percentage for lesion volume. Lesion's volume is the part of the vertebral volume occupied by a lesion. C1, … C7 refer to the cervical vertebral levels.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A