GWAS statistical analysis

SV Stacey Saenz de Viteri
JZ Jian Zhang
EJ Emma C. Johnson
PB Peter B. Barr
HE Howard J. Edenberg
VH Victor M. Hesselbrock
JJ John I. Nurnberger, Jr
AP Ashwini K. Pandey
CK Chella Kamarajan
SK Sivan Kinreich
JT Jay A. Tischfield
MP Martin H. Plawecki
JK John R. Kramer
DL Dongbing Lai
SK Samuel Kuperman
GC Grace Chan
VM Vivia V. McCutcheon
KB Kathleen K. Bucholz
BP Bernice Porjesz
JM Jacquelyn L. Meyers
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Genetic analysis was conducted on 7,009,929 SNPs in the European ancestry (EA) sample and 13,862,444 SNPs in the African ancestry sample by the generalized disequilibrium test (GDT) method [45] using family-based information. Principal components (PCs) derived from GWAS data were used to assign ancestry in the genotyped sample, and families were classified as EA or AA according to the ancestry of the greatest proportion of family members. Analyses were conducted separately in the families of AA and EA, using identical phenotypic definitions, covariates, SNP QC standards, MAF thresholds and imputation protocols. Sex, age, the first three PCs (PC1-PC3) computed from SNPRelate, and genotype array were included as covariates. Subsequently, meta-analysis across the EA and AA samples was performed using inverse-variance weighting and genomic control in METAL [46]. Established thresholds for genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) were used. We performed MAGMA [47] competitive gene-set analyses using the summary statistics from the GWAS of PTSD in EA and AA individuals using FUMA v1.3.6a (Functional Mapping and Annotation of Genome-Wide Association Studies) [48]. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx v8 [49]) database was used to obtain gene expression levels in 10 different brain regions.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A