As Fig. S2 shows, the outcome variable was heavily skewed. No substantial comments were made by new audiences during 89.35% of the organization per day observations in the dataset.
Distribution of outcome variable.
Because of the heavy skew in the outcome variable, I examined the association between the number of comments (y) an organization (i) received each day (t) and the indicators described in the main text, using a negative binomial regression model with fixed effects for time. Because fixed-effects negative binomial regression models allow for individual-specific variation in the dispersion parameter, rather than variation in the conditional mean, I also include fixed effects for each organization to facilitate unconditional estimation (19):
In addition to the indicators described in the main text of this article, the model also includes an Inverse Mills Ratio variable generated using two-stage estimation procedures to account for the modest difference in the rate of cultural betweenness among organization inside and outside the final study sample. As an additional robustness check, I ran a zero-inflated regression model, a fixed-effects Poisson regression model, and a log-linear model. Each of these alternative models produced nearly identical results.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.