Outcome measures

MW Maren Wiechers
MS Michael Strupf
MB Malek Bajbouj
KB Kerem Böge
CK Carine Karnouk
SG Stephan Goerigk
IK Inge Kamp-Becker
TB Tobias Banaschewski
MR Michael Rapp
AH Alkomiet Hasan
PF Peter Falkai
AJ Andrea Jobst-Heel
UH Ute Habel
TS Thomas Stamm
AH Andreas Heinz
AH Andreas Hoell
MB Max Burger
TB Tilmann Bunse
EH Edgar Hoehne
NM Nassim Mehran
FK Franziska Kaiser
EH Eric Hahn
PP Paul Plener
Aline Übleis
FP Frank Padberg
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The primary outcome was self-rated depression severity at post-intervention assessed by the PHQ-9. The self-rating instrument assesses depressive symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale resulting in sum scores between 0 and 27 [15]. The scale provides a test–retest reliability of 0.84 and an internal consistency of α = 0.86–0.89 [15]. Validated across different populations and cultural settings [22], the PHQ-9 is recommended by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) to be used as a general measure of depression severity.

In brief, secondary outcome measures were as follows: the MÅDRS, assessing clinician-rated depression severity [16], the RHS-15 as a screening instrument for depressive symptoms, anxiety, and trauma-related disorders in refugees and asylum seekers [17], the BRS assessing the ability to recover from stress and adversity [18], the General Self-Efficacy Scale assessing patients’ sense of effective personal action control [19], the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire assessing emotional and behavioral problems [20], and the WHOQoL-BREF assessing patient’s quality of life [21]. Further descriptions and characteristics of these measures are reported in the Supplementary Material.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A