Statistics

SH Stephanie Huwiler
MC Manuel Carro-Domínguez
FS Fabia M Stich
RS Rossella Sala
FA Florent Aziri
AT Anna Trippel
TR Tabea Ryf
SM Susanne Markendorf
DN David Niederseer
PB Philipp Bohm
GS Gloria Stoll
LL Lily Laubscher
JT Jeivicaa Thevan
CS Christina M Spengler
JG Joanna Gawinecka
EO Elena Osto
RH Reto Huber
NW Nicole Wenderoth
CS Christian Schmied
CL Caroline Lustenberger
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We compared the outcome variables using linear mixed-effects models (fixed factor: condition, random factor: subject). Overnight differences were calculated as morning–evening values. If the linear mixed-effects model was significant for condition, we derived post hoc P-values for ISI1High and ISI1Low each compared with SHAM corrected for multiple comparisons for each model separately using the Hochberg method. Visual inspection of the residual plots of the linear models did not reveal any obvious deviations from normality or homoscedasticity. P-values <.05 were considered statistically significant.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A