Statistical analyses

YG Yuko Gando
HM Haruka Murakami
KY Kenta Yamamoto
RK Ryoko Kawakami
HO Harumi Ohno
SS Susumu S. Sawada
NM Nobuyuki Miyatake
MM Motohiko Miyachi
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Means ± standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the relationship of the continuous variables to categories of flexibility levels. The differences between baseline and follow-up measurements were assessed by paired t-test and McNemar's non-parametric test. In the ANOVA, Scheffe's method was used to identify significant differences among mean values.

Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyze the relationships between the 5-year changes in cfPWV and baseline values of factors known to influence vascular stiffness and 5-year changes in these variables.

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were estimated to test differences in the annual rate of cfPWV [annual ΔcfPWV: (follow-up cfPWV—baseline cfPWV)/follow-up years] across flexibility levels. The annual ΔcfPWV was entered as a dependent variable; the tertile flexibility category was entered as a fixed factor; and baseline age, weight, body fat, systolic blood pressure (SBP), HR, cfPWV, peak oxygen uptake, moderate physical activity time, vigorous physical activity time, and sex were entered as covariates for adjustment. Pairwise post-hoc comparisons were examined using a Bonferroni test. In ANCOVA, data were expressed as estimated marginal mean ± standard error.

A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the influences of baseline values of factors known to influence vascular stiffness and changes in these variables (annual rate of change) on the annual ΔcfPWV.

P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Japan v.20.0, Japan).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A