2.1. Device Criteria and Constraints

RA Rami Alhamad
NS Nitin Seth
HA Hussein A. Abdullah
ask Ask a question
Favorite

This device was the culmination of multiple consultations with physiotherapists as well as those of potential study participants contacted during the initial design process. The feedback from the physiotherapist and the stroke patients (users) is a critical component in developing a robotic rehabilitation device [11]. Design components were created based on Health Canada Safety Regulations as well as key criteria noted by physiotherapists. These criteria are summarized in Table 1 below and were fully incorporated into the design.

Summary of criteria from physiotherapists and users.

The specifications of these physiotherapists were based on their 10+ years of experience in treating stroke patients for the recovery of hand mobility. The device was intended for use with subjects with limited mobility in their hands and at approximately Stroke Stage 2 or 3 on the Chedoke–McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale (CMSA) [35]. Subjects in Stage 1 who could not use their hands and those who were hypertonic could not use the device. User feedback was collected to assess the adequacy of comfort and fit and to determine any possible need for major design revisions that might be required in response to complaints or suggestions.

The average and maximum forces necessary to open the hand of a stroke patient were determined by tests conducted at the Regional Rehabilitation Center, Hamilton Health Sciences in Hamilton. The test included eight stroke patients in determining the forces required to extend the fingers of their impaired hand. The results of this test are included in Table 2.

The force required to extend the fingers of an impaired hand.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A