2.7. T cell phenotypic assessment

LF Lorenzo Federico
TT Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt
MG Murat Gainullin
JO Julie Røkke Osen
VC Viktoriia Chaban
KL Katrine Persgård Lund
LT Lisa Tietze
TT Trung The Tran
FL Fridtjof Lund-Johansen
HK Hassen Kared
AL Andreas Lind
JV John Torgils Vaage
RS Richard Stratford
ST Simen Tennøe
BM Brandon Malone
TC Trevor Clancy
AM Anders Eivind Leren Myhre
TG Tobias Gedde-Dahl
LM Ludvig André Munthe
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To evaluate T cell reactivity to antigenic challenge, a Reactivity Score (RS) metric was generated from the analysis of cell populations defined by the combined expression of 4 AIMs. These markers and 3 gated areas of interest (Single +, Double +, and “All”) were used to define a total of 16 partially overlapping cell populations ( Supplementary Figure S1A , Supplementary Table S2 ). We selected T cell populations whose response (frequency after stimulus minus background frequency) was significantly higher in healthy controls than HSCT patients and normalized each value by the average frequency of all measurements for that population. When the frequency after stimulation was smaller than the background (frequency after stimulus minus background frequency < 0), the patient was assigned a RS value of ‘zero’. The RS for each patient was then computed by averaging the normalized frequency of the selected populations for each T cell subset (selected T cell populations are shown in Supplementary Figure S2 ). Similarly, the score for differential reactivity (DR) was computed by normalizing the difference in T cell response to Spike-C and Spike-I pool stimulation (Spike-C minus Spike-I). The T cell populations selected for DR calculation are shown in Supplementary Table S2 . Raw frequency data for each population are reported in Supplementary Table S3 .

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A