Foxc1 fl/fl , Foxc2 fl/fl , Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl (Sasman et al, 2012), Cdh5‐Cre ERT2 (Sorensen et al, 2009), Vegfr3‐Cre ERT2 (Martinez‐Corral et al, 2016), and Foxc2‐Cre ERT2 (Amin et al, 2017) mice were used. EC‐specific or LEC‐specific Foxc1, Foxc2, and compound Foxc1;Foxc2‐mutant mice were generated by crossing Foxc‐floxed females (Foxc1 fl/fl , Foxc2 fl/fl , and Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl ) with Cdh5‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl (EC‐Foxc1‐KO), Cdh5‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc2 fl/fl (EC‐Foxc2‐KO), Cdh5‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl (EC‐Foxc‐DKO), Vegfr3‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl (LEC‐Foxc1‐KO), Vegfr3‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc2 fl/fl (LEC‐Foxc2‐KO), Vegfr3‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl (LEC‐Foxc‐DKO) males, respectively, as described previously (Norden et al, 2020). For Cre recombination efficiency detection, mTmG/+;Cdh5‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl (mTmG/EC‐Foxc‐DKO), mTmG/+;Vegfr3‐Cre ERT2 ;Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl (mTmG/LEC‐Foxc‐DKO) and mTmG/+;Foxc2‐Cre ERT2 mice were generated by crossing mTmG females (mTmG/mTmG;Foxc1 fl/fl ;Foxc2 fl/fl and mTmG/mTmG) with EC‐Foxc‐DKO, LEC‐Foxc‐DKO and Foxc2‐Cre ERT2 males, respectively. Genotyping of mice was performed by Transnetyx Inc.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.