Three acquisitions were performed at 120 kVp and 255 mAs using a retrospective ECG-gated helical acquisition at a chosen heart rate (60 bpm) on each CT system. Tube current modulation was disabled. Beam collimation, rotation time, and pitch factor for the EID-DECT scanner were chosen to imitate clinical practice (Table (Table11).
Acquisition and reconstruction parameters used on the dual-layer energy-integrating detector dual-energy CT systems (EID-DECT) (IQon CT, CT7500) and spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) systems
HRB (high-resolution standard filter) and CB (cardiac standard filter) were used for high-resolution (HR) imaging in combination with 0.67 mm slice thickness. Detailed 2 was used for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) imaging in combination with 0.43 mm slice thickness. Slice thickness was set at 0.43 mm contiguous for the SPCCT, i.e., adapted to the reconstructed in-plane pixel size for isotropic voxel size, and at 0.67 mm for matching the minimal slice thickness available with EID-DECT. Note that slice increment was set at half of the slice thickness for EID-DECT images such as performed in clinical practice. Slice increment was similar for SPCCT images enabled by thinner slice thickness
†Detailed 2 and HRB have the same cut-off frequency at 14.6-line pairs, but Detailed 2 filter has higher frequency at 50% and 20% modulation transfer function values
‡CB filter cut-off is at 12-line pairs per centimeter
Data were reconstructed during the mid-diastolic phase (78% of the R-R interval) of the cardiac cycle. For EID-DECT, raw data were reconstructed according to clinical practice using high-resolution (HR) parameters, with level 1 of the 7 available levels in the spectral reconstruction algorithm, the highest-frequency kernel available CB (Cardiac Standard) and the minimal slice thickness achievable (0.67 mm), corresponding to HR–EID-DECT images. For SPCCT, raw data were reconstructed with level 6 of an adapted hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (iDose4). Two different-resolution images were reconstructed with HR-SPCCT images using an HRB kernel and a 0.67-mm slice thickness, and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) SPCCT images were reconstructed using a Detailed-2 kernel and a 0.43-mm slice thickness.
To compare the performance of the SPCCT VMIs with conventional acquisitions, an additional reconstruction was performed with the same parameters. This comparison was not made for EID-DLCT because different reconstruction kernels (CB vs. XCB) and reconstruction algorithms (a spectral reconstruction algorithm vs. the iDose4 algorithm) were used for spectral and conventional acquisitions.
For all images and both phantoms, the field of view was set at 220 mm and a standard matrix size of 512 × 512 pixels was used. The other acquisition and reconstruction parameters used for both CT systems are depicted in Table Table11.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.