Analysis of antibiotic patterns of use

NR Neal J. Russell
WS Wolfgang Stöhr
NP Nishad Plakkal
AC Aislinn Cook
JB James A. Berkley
BA Bethou Adhisivam
RA Ramesh Agarwal
NA Nawshad Uddin Ahmed
MB Manica Balasegaram
DB Daynia Ballot
AB Adrie Bekker
EB Eitan Naaman Berezin
DB Davide Bilardi
SB Suppawat Boonkasidecha
CC Cristina G. Carvalheiro
NC Neema Chami
SC Suman Chaurasia
SC Sara Chiurchiu
VC Viviane Rinaldi Favarin Colas
SC Simon Cousens
TC Tim R. Cressey
AA Ana Carolina Dantas de Assis
TD Tran Minh Dien
YD Yijun Ding
ND Nguyen Trong Dung
HD Han Dong
AD Angela Dramowski
MD Madhusudhan DS
AD Ajay Dudeja
JF Jinxing Feng
YG Youri Glupczynski
SG Srishti Goel
HG Herman Goossens
DH Doan Thi Huong Hao
MK Mahmudul Islam Khan
TH Tatiana Munera Huertas
MI Mohammad Shahidul Islam
DJ Daniel Jarovsky
NK Nathalie Khavessian
MK Meera Khorana
AK Angeliki Kontou
TK Tomislav Kostyanev
PL Premsak Laoyookhon
SL Sorasak Lochindarat
ML Mattias Larsson
ML Maia De Luca
SM Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
NM Nivedita Mondal
NM Nitu Mundhra
PM Philippa Musoke
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The initial antibiotic regimen was defined as the first new antibiotic(s) started within 24 h from baseline blood culture (including 3 h pre baseline culture). To structure the analysis and reporting of the multiple regimens used, a novel method of grouping antibiotics was derived, based on the Essential Medicine List for Children (EMLc) AWaRe classification (Access, Watch, Reserve) [24], with the “Watch” category divided into 3 distinct groups of “Low/Medium/High Watch” based on inclusion in current WHO guidelines (Low Watch) and likelihood of resistance generation with regimens outside WHO recommendations (Medium or High Watch) [25]. Antibiotic groups were defined by the main “stem” in the antibiotic combination: Group 1 antibiotics included a first-line WHO-recommended penicillin-based regimen (e.g., ampicillin and gentamicin) (Access), Group 2 included third-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime/ceftriaxone)-based WHO regimens (“Low” Watch), Group 3 included regimens with partial anti-extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or pseudomonal activity (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam/ceftazidime/fluoroquinolone-based) (“Medium” Watch), and Group 4 included carbapenems (e.g., meropenem) (“High” Watch). Group 5 antibiotics included Reserve antibiotics targeting carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) (e.g., colistin). Aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin/amikacin), glycopeptides (e.g., vancomycin/teicoplanin), and metronidazole used in combination regimens were classified as additional coverage and did not define the main antibiotic “stem” for the grouping. All antifungals and antivirals were excluded from the antimicrobial treatment data as these were not relevant to the analysis. Escalation of treatment was defined as a switch to a higher group antibiotic, and de-escalation was defined as switching to a lower group or discontinuation of the “stem” antibiotic while continuing with an additional coverage antibiotic.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A