2.4. Evaluation of the Metal Release from the Spiked Soil under a Bubble Water Flow

YZ Yihan Zhang
ZS Zimu Song
KS Kosuke Sugita
SX Shan Xue
WZ Wen Zhang
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To evaluate the effect of different NBs on Pb release, the different types of bubble water (CO2, CH4, and H2) were pumped into the soil column at a fixed flow flux of 0.71 mL·min−1·cm−2. The Pb-spiked soil columns underwent two parallel soil-washing tests. The column was sealed by a rubber plug at the top to keep the drainage from being exposed to air. Effluent that was not exposed to air was collected from a sidewall port 20 cm above the bottom of the cylinder. Then, 10 mL of the effluent samples was taken directly from the effluent collection point every 10 min for the first 60 min and every 30 min for the following 60 min to analyze the leached heavy metal concentration. Deionized (DI) water without NBs was pumped into the column at the same flux for comparison as a negative control group. For the soil spiked with multiple metals (i.e., Pb, Cu, Zn, and Cr), CO2 NB water was used to rinse the column soil and assess the leaching efficiencies. To determine significant differences between the control and experimental data, one-way analysis of variance (t-test, two-sided, with a significance level of α = 0.05) was employed to assess the data statistics of heavy metal concentrations in the leachate. All statistical analysis and data plotting were carried out using Excel 2016 and Origin version 2020b [35]. All the standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from two parallel experiments’ data, which are subjected to uncertainties in sampling and instrument analysis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A