PICO question development

FC Fabio Cesare Campanile
MP Mauro Podda
FP Francesca Pecchini
MI Marco Inama
SM Sarah Molfino
MB Marco Augusto Bonino
MO Monica Ortenzi
GS Gianfranco Silecchia
FA Ferdinando Agresta
MC Michela Cinquini
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The panel formulated the questions addressed in this guideline following the PICO criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome). Several outcomes of interest for each question were identified, and their relative relevance was graded as follows [11, 13]:

Only "critical" or "important" outcomes were considered in the literature review and subsequently in the formulation of recommendations, according to the criteria shown in Table Table11.

Relevance of the Outcome measures according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations)

Included into the evidence table/summary of findings table

Included into the Recommendations

Included into the evidence table/summary of findings table

Not included into the Recommendations

Not included into the evidence table/summary of findings table

Not Included into the Recommendations

From: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A