Assessment of methodological quality of included reviews

DN Devaki Nambiar
BM Bincy Mathew
SD Shubhankar Dubey
SM Sandeep Moola
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The methodological quality of each included SR was assessed in duplicate by SD and BM using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) checklist [21] and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist [22]. The quality rating in the included SRs was classified as high, moderate, low depending on the scores for individual items in the tools as decided with consensus (High: if Yes > 81%; Moderate: between 81% and 56%, Low: if Yes < 60%). Resolution of any disagreements was resolved through consensus with the help of a third reviewer (DN).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A