2.2. Data extraction and quality assessment

YH Yibin Hao
GS Guoyong Shan
KN Kejun Nan
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Data extraction of included in literatures: (1) general data, including authors, published time, published journal, title, the numbers of cases in experimental group and in control group; (2) methodological characteristics: cutoff value; (3) characteristics of research results: diagnostic results of genetic markers for colorectal cancer, including TP, FP, FN and TN.

Quality assessment of included literatures: included literatures were separately and independently assessed and performed cross-check by two professional reviewers using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) developed by Whiting et al. (2003). QUADAS consists of 14 assessment indicators. Regarding each indicator, “Yes” indicates meeting the standard; “No” indicates not meeting the standard, “Not clear” indicates insufficient information can be got from the literature to determine whether the standard is met.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A