Statistical Analysis

MR Melissa A. Rolfes
HT H. Keipp Talbot
HM Huong Q. McLean
MS Melissa S. Stockwell
KE Katherine D. Ellingson
KL Karen Lutrick
NB Natalie M. Bowman
EB Emily E. Bendall
AB Ayla Bullock
JC James D. Chappell
JD Jessica E. Deyoe
JG Julie Gilbert
NH Natasha B. Halasa
KH Kimberly E. Hart
SJ Sheroi Johnson
AK Ahra Kim
AL Adam S. Lauring
JL Jessica T. Lin
CL Christopher J. Lindsell
SM Son H. McLaren
JM Jennifer K. Meece
AM Alexandra M. Mellis
MZ Miriana Moreno Zivanovich
CO Constance E. Ogokeh
MR Michelle Rodriguez
ES Ellen Sano
RF Raul A. Silverio Francisco
JS Jonathan E. Schmitz
CV Celibell Y. Vargas
AY Amy Yang
YZ Yuwei Zhu
EB Edward A. Belongia
CR Carrie Reed
CG Carlos G. Grijalva
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Analyses were restricted to households affected by influenza A(H3N2) viruses, to contacts who provided nasal swab specimens on at least 4 days, and to household contacts with complete data for covariates of interest. Within a household, the person(s) with influenza virus infection who had the first illness onset was considered the primary case; individuals could be co-primary cases if they shared the same illness onset date with another person in the household. Only contacts from households with a single primary case were included in analyses. Analyses focused on people who were household contacts of the primary case. Characteristics of participants were compared across study periods, using 2-sided Fisher exact tests where P values were reported (P values <.05 were considered significant).

The risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H3N2) virus infection among household contacts was compared by study period (2021-2022 vs prepandemic) using modified Poisson regression and generalized estimating equations to account for household clustering. Estimated relative risks of infection were adjusted for household density, age of the contact, current season influenza vaccination in the contact, and time spent in the same room as the primary case the day before enrollment.

Planned subgroup analyses were conducted by fitting 3 adjusted models with an interaction between study period and age of the household contact, influenza vaccination status of the household contact, or interaction with the primary case (defined by the amount of time the household contact spent in the same room as the primary case after the primary case’s illness onset). Because some sites were not represented across all study periods, a prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed using data from Tennessee, which enrolled participants in both study periods. Additional sensitivity analyses were conducted by modeling household infection risk by year (with 2018-2019 season as the reference). Analyses were conducted using R (version 4.0.4).10

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A