For all pairwise comparisons (i.e., comparisons between two within- or between-subjects conditions), we used dependent and independent t-tests. For within-subjects comparisons that involved more than two conditions and/or more than one factor, we used linear mixed models (LMMs). We chose LMMs instead of within-subjects ANOVAs because LMMs allow for a more precise modeling of the data (via the inclusion of random intercepts and slopes for each participant) and because, with LMMs, it is possible to include non-categorical factors (e.g., time course). For between-subjects comparisons that involved more than two conditions and/or more than one factor, we used a multiple linear regression (MLR). We chose a MLR instead of a between-subjects ANOVA because we aimed to perform a step-wise regression to assess the variance explained by our questionnaire scales on top of the variance explained by the experimental factors. For comparing frequencies, we used a standard Chi-squared test.
We will first report the results for Experiments 1 and 2, focusing on the knowledge manipulation (computer capacity known/unknown), see Fig. 3. Next, we will report an analysis that combines data from Experiments 1 and 2 with the two experiments from our previous study (Wahn et al., 2023). This analysis gives us a 2 × 2 between-study design with the between-study factor “Bonus task” (with, without), with a bonus task present in the current but absent in our previous study, and the within-study factor “Computer capacity” (known, unknown); see Fig. 6. Finally, we will report the results for Experiment 3, focusing on the incentive manipulation (bonus task with/without incentive). To do so, we compare Experiment 3 (bonus task without incentive) to Experiment 2 (bonus task with incentive) and to Experiment 2 from our previous study (no bonus task); see Fig. 7.
Offloading percentage for Experiment 1 (left) and Experiment 2 (right). Errors bars are Standard Error of the Mean
Offloading percentage, displayed as a function of Bonus task (with, without) and Computer capacity (known, unknown). Note that the data in the left panel (“with bonus task”) represent Experiment 1 (Unknown) and 2 (Known) from the present study (compare Fig. 3), whereas data in the right panel (“without bonus task”) are taken from Experiments 1 and 2 from our own previous study (Wahn et al., 2023). Errors bars are Standard Error of the Mean
Offloading percentage as a function of monetary incentive and bonus task availability. Errors bars are Standard Error of the Mean
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.