ask Ask a question
Favorite

The Adult Executive Function Inventory (ADEXI; [37]), measures EF on a 14-item self-report scale, with responses on a five-point Likert scale ranging from zero (definitely not true) to four (definitely true). Items 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 comprise the working memory subscale, e.g.: “I have difficulty remembering lengthy instructions” and “when someone asks me to do several things, I sometimes only remember the first or last”. The remaining items make up the inhibition subscale, e.g.: “I have a tendency to do things without first thinking about what could happen” and “I sometimes have difficulty stopping myself from doing something that I like even though someone tells me that it is not allowed”. A higher score on the scale or each of the subscales indicates greater impairment. The ADEXI has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, but poor convergent validity with neuropsychological tests of EF [37]. The ADEXI has good internal consistency (α = 0.68–0.72; [37]).

Symptoms of PTSD and CPTSD were measured using the International Trauma Questionnaire [38], an 18-item scale with responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from zero (not at all) to four (extremely). Two items measure each of the three PTSD symptom clusters: hyperarousal, re-experiencing and avoidance. Two items measure each of the three disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptom clusters that comprise CPTSD: negative self-concept, interpersonal relationships and affect dysregulation. Three identical items then measure functional impairment related to the PTSD and DSO symptom clusters respectively. The ITQ has strong psychometric properties [39]. Possible caseness for PTSD is indicated by a score of two or higher on at least one of each item measuring each PTSD symptom cluster, as well scoring two or higher on one of the three functional impairment items relating to PTSD symptom clusters. Possible caseness for CPTSD is indicated by meeting the criteria for PTSD, as well as scoring two or higher on at least one of the two items for each DSO symptom cluster, and at least a two on one of the functional impairment items relating to DSO symptoms. The ITQ has good internal consistency (α = 0.90; [39]).

Symptoms of generalised anxiety and depression were measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12; [40]), a 12-item scale where a score of four or higher is indicative of potential caseness for common mental health difficulties (CMDs). The GHQ-9 has good internal consistency (α = 0.72; [41]).

Somatic symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; [41]), a 15-item scale where a score above 15 indicates higher severity of somatic symptoms. The PHQ-15 has good internal consistency (α = 0.80; [42]).

Symptoms of poor sleep quality were measured using the Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI; [43]), an eight-item scale where a score below 16 is indicative of a potential insomnia disorder. The SCI has good internal consistency (α = 0.86; [44]).

Symptoms of difficulties with anger were measured using the Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5; [45]), a five-item scale where a score higher than 12 is indicative of possible anger difficulties. The DAR-5 has good internal consistency (α = 0.89–0.90; [46]).

Symptoms of alcohol misuse were measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT; [47]), a 10-item scale where scores higher than eight and 16 respectively are classified as possible hazardous and harmful alcohol use. The AUDIT has good internal consistency (α = 0.60–0.80; [48]).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A