The ancestors explaining the genetic variability of each population were identified in order of importance to the population in terms of genetic contribution; their marginal and cumulative contributions to the population were computed. Each additional ancestor was selected based on the proportion of genes it contributes that were not yet explained by previously selected ancestors until all genetic variability in the reference population was accounted for (Boichard et al., 1997). For the 18 external sires and the 12 USSES sires, the marginal contributions for each sire were determined. For each sire, the number of breeding years, number of offspring, number of retained offspring, and GCI were obtained.
To compare the two sire groups, total lambs produced and total contribution to retained lambs for the study period were computed. Population differentiation between the two sire groups was compared using Nei’s minimum distance (Nei, 1978) and Wright’s FST (Wright, 1951). Nei’s minimum distance (D) was computed as
where fii and fjj are the average coancestry within populations i and j and fij is the average coancestry between the two populations. Wright’s FST was computed as
where is the average coancestry for the subpopulation and is the mean coancestry for the entire population.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.