Evaluation

DS Désirée Schliemann
KR Kogila Ramanathan
NT Nor Saleha Binti Ibrahim Tamin
CO Ciaran O’Neill
CC Christopher R Cardwell
RI Roshidi Ismail
ZK Zaid Kassim
FK Frank Kee
TS Tin Tin Su
MD Michael Donnelly
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The intervention was evaluated using the RE-AIM outcomes framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) and measures of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility [12]. The most recently conducted annual health survey provided socio-demographic and health information about each participant and this information was linked to primary data collection about outcomes that was captured by SEACO. Information about non-completion of an iFOBT kit was collected by research staff during a phone call that they conducted with each participant, two weeks after sending a kit to them.

Post-intervention interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of purposively selected study participants. Participants were selected based on their ethnicity, gender and completion of study components and asked a combination of qualitative and quantitative questions during a telephone interview [12]. Findings from the quantitative response-type questions are described here and the qualitative data is undergoing analysis and will be reported separately.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A