Passive avoidance test

JL Jae Sung Lim
EJ Eun Jae Jeon
HG Hye Sun Go
HK Hyung-Jin Kim
KK Kye Young Kim
TN Thi Quynh Trang Nguyen
DL Da Young Lee
KK Kyu Suk Kim
FP Federico Pietrocola
SH Seol Hee Hong
SL Shee Eun Lee
KK Kyoung-Shim Kim
TP Tae-Shin Park
DC Dong-Hee Choi
YJ Yu-Jin Jeong
JP Jong-Hwan Park
HK Hyeon Sik Kim
JM Jung-Joon Min
YK Yong Sook Kim
JP Joon Tae Park
JC Jae-Ho Cho
GL Gil-Woo Lee
JL Ji Hyeon Lee
HC Hyon E. Choy
SP Sang Chul Park
CL Chul-Ho Lee
JR Joon Haeng Rhee
MS Manuel Serrano
KC Kyung A Cho
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The test apparatus consisted of a light and a dark chamber (17 × 22 × 20 cm), each equipped with a shock-grid floor and a door between the two chambers. During the first day of testing, each mouse was placed in the light chamber and left to habituate to the apparatus for 5 min, while allowing it to explore the light and dark rooms. On the second day, the mice were placed in the light chamber. After 20 sec, the door was opened, and the mice were allowed to enter into the dark chamber such that all four paws were inside. When the mice entered the dark room, the door was closed, and one successive electric foot-shock (0.1 mA, 2 sec) was delivered through the grid floor. After training, the mice were then returned to their home cages. After 7 days, the mice were individually replaced in the light chamber, and the latency to enter the dark chamber was measured, which was recorded as the posttest latency62. The cut-off time for the entry into the dark chamber was 180 sec.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A