Expression and purification of CCL2–CCR2–Gi and apo CCR3–Gi complexes

ZS Zhehua Shao
YT Yangxia Tan
QS Qingya Shen
LH Li Hou
BY Bingpeng Yao
JQ Jiao Qin
PX Peiyu Xu
CM Chunyou Mao
LC Li-Nan Chen
HZ Huibing Zhang
DS Dan-Dan Shen
CZ Chao Zhang
WL Weijie Li
XD Xufei Du
FL Fei Li
ZC Zhi-Hua Chen
YJ Yi Jiang
HX H. Eric Xu
SY Songmin Ying
HM Honglei Ma
YZ Yan Zhang
HS Huahao Shen
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In this work, a NanoBiT tethering strategy was employed for complex stabilization2527. For the purification of CCL2–CCR2–Gi, the sequence of human CCR2 (residues 1–355) was fused with a LgBiT subunit (Promega) at the C-terminus followed by a double MBP-tag via a GS linker containing a TEV protease cleavage site (ENLYFQG). The sequence of CCL2(1–72) was fused to the N-terminus of CCR2. For the expression of the apo CCR3–Gi complex, a constitutive active mutation was introduced (I2446.40A). CCR3 was fused with a 6× His-tag at the N-terminus and a following BRIL (MBP) fusion protein via a linker containing a TEV protease site (ENLYFQG). And the sequence of prolactin precursor (PP) signal peptide was fused into the N-terminus of CCL3(4–69) and BRIL-CCR3. In this study, the human CCL11(1–74) was also purified for use in the formation of the CCR3–Gi complex. First, we cloned the cDNA sequence of CCL11(1–74) into a pETDuet vector with an N-terminal SUMO and 6× His-tag. The CCL11 expression vector was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. After overnight expression at 16 °C, an Ni-chelating HP Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) was used for purification of 6× His-SUMO-CCL11. Then, the purified protein was desalted and treated with ULP1 protease to remove the 6× His-SUMO-tag. The cleaved protein was passed through the Ni-chelating HP Sepharose column again, and CCL11 without the tag was collected as flow-through. Finally, CCL11 was purified by gel filtration chromatography with a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol.

The sf9 insect cells were infected with viruses encoding CCL2–CCR2–LgBiT/CCR3–LgBiT, Gαi, Gβ1–peptide86, Gγ2, and scFv16 at a ratio of 1.5:1:1:1:2. After 48 h expression, the infected cells were collected and resuspended in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM CaCl2 supplemented with an EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (TargetMol). Then, 10 μM of purified CCL11 was added for the activation of CCR3, and the membrane was solubilized with 0.5% (w/v) n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM, Anatrace), 0.01% (w/v) LMNG, and 0.1% (w/v) CHS for 2 h at 4 °C. For the CCL2–CCR2–Gi complex, the supernatant was collected and incubated with amylose resin (NEB). After binding, the resin was packed into a gravity-flow column and washed in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% (w/v) LMNG, 0.01% (w/v) GDN (Anatrace), and 0.004% (w/v) CHS. TEV protease was then added to remove the C-terminal MBP, the cleaved protein was passed through Amylose resin again, and the complexes without MBP were collected as flow-through. For the purification of the CCR3–Gi complex, the supernatant was isolated and incubated at 4 °C with TALON® Metal Affinity Resin. After binding, the talon resin with protein complex was loaded onto a gravity-flow column. The talon resin was washed with 20 column volumes of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 25 mM imidazole, 0.01% (w/v) LMNG, 0.005% (w/v) GDN (Anatrace), and 0.004% (w/v) CHS and eluted with the same buffer plus 300 mM imidazole. The complex was concentrated and loaded onto a Superdex 200 10/300 GL Increase column (GE Healthcare), and monomeric CCL2–CCR2–Gi and apo CCR3–Gi complexes were collected in 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.0005% (w/v) LMNG, 0.00025% GDN, and 0.0002% (w/v) CHS.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A