Quality assessment

HG Hoda Gad
NA Noor Al‐Nassr
IM Ibrahim Mohammed
AK Adnan Khan
RM Ross MacDonald
PM Paul Mussleman
RM Rayaz A. Malik
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Included studies were assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non‐randomized Studies – on Interventions (ROBINS‐I) tool 18 . This tool categorizes the risk of bias as low, moderate, serious, critical and unclear. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias was used for the randomized studies (section 8.5) 19 . This tool assessed six domains: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias. Quality assessment was undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer, and disagreements regarding the quality of a trial were resolved by consensus, or after consultation with the third reviewer (RAM). If a study’s risk of bias was serious, critical or unclear, the effect of removing this study was checked and relevant outcomes were reported.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A