2.5. Statistical Analysis

WW Weijia Wu
NT Nu Tang
JZ Jingjing Zeng
JJ Jin Jing
LC Li Cai
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Maternal characteristics and dietary consumption were, respectively, described as means ± standard deviation (SD) or numbers and percentages (%) for continuous variables and categorical variables. The differences in the basic characteristics of participants with and without GDM were determined by the t-test or Chi-square test.

Dietary protein patterns were constructed using the K-means cluster approach according to protein-rich food groups. Previous studies have reported a reasonable reproducibility and fair to modest validity of the dietary patterns derived by cluster analysis [36]. Firstly, the percentage of total dietary protein provided by each food group was calculated for each individual. Due to the cluster analysis being sensitive to outliers, we excluded subjects whose protein contribution was 5 SDs away from the mean protein contribution for each group and verified each food group contributing more than 0.5% of the total daily protein. Secondly, we used the FASTCLUS procedure in SAS software to generate dietary protein clusters. It is required that the number of clusters (k) be specified before analysis. In our study, the procedure was performed with pre-determined numbers of clusters (3–5 times) to assess the optimal number of clusters representing the dietary protein patterns in the current sample. Finally, the three-cluster set was applied because it distinguished the most meaningful separated dietary clusters; additionally, subjects were distributed well between three clusters, presenting a high F ratio.

We estimated the associations between dietary protein intake and protein patterns with risk of GDM using logistic regression. Potential confounders were adjusted in the logistic regression. We adjusted for gestational age, pre-pregnancy BMI, as well as age in model 1. In model 2, we additionally adjusted for family history of diabetes and history of GDM. Model 3 was further adjusted for smoking status, alcohol use during pregnancy, physical activities, dietary energy intake, protein-to-energy ratio, carbohydrate-to-energy ratio, fat-to-energy ratio, fiber, and cholesterol. In the last model, educational level and monthly household income were further adjusted. The total animal and plant protein intakes were divided into quartiles. The relation of the quartiles of the maternal protein intake to GDM risk were also tested using logistic regression analysis. We conducted linear trend tests across the quartiles of protein intake by taking the median of each quartile as continuous variables. All the analyses were conducted with SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). We considered p < 0.05 in the two-sided test as significant.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A