Sample Collection and Etiological Diagnosis

HS He Sun
FW Feilong Wang
MZ Ming Zhang
XX Xiaoyong Xu
ML Miaomiao Li
WG Wei Gao
XW Xiaodong Wu
HH Huize Han
QW Qin Wang
GY Gehong Yao
ZL Zheng Lou
HX Han Xia
YS Yi Shi
QL Qiang Li
ask Ask a question
Favorite

BALF was collected according to previous consensus and guideline (Meyer et al., 2012; Diseases CSoR, 2017). After eliminating contraindications, all patients underwent bronchoscopy under intravenous combined anesthesia or 2% lidocaine topical anesthesia. After an equal volume of normal saline was fractionally injected into the affected bronchial segments, BALF was aspirated under negative pressure for related testing.

All patients were subject to pathogen detection using BALF-mNGS and conventional methods at the same time. BALF and peripheral blood specimens were simultaneously submitted for microscopic examination. Lavage fluid was centrifuged to collect the sediment for pathogen identification under the microscope after staining. The fully automated medical PCR analysis system GeneXpert Dx System (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used for pathogen nucleic acid detection. A microbial culture (BACT-ALERT; bioMérieux, France) and automated microbial identification systems (VITEK 2 Compact and VITEK MS; bioMérieux, France) were employed.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A