Phylogenetic analysis

WC Wan Chen
KM Keer Miao
JW Junqi Wang
HW Hao Wang
WS Wan Sun
SY Sijia Yuan
SL Site Luo
CH Chaochao Hu
QC Qing Chang
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood analysis (ML). Two species (Vanellus vanellus GenBank no. KM577158 and Tringa glareolaKY128485) were used as outgroups. There were two datasets as follows: (1) concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes and 12S and 16S rRNA for nine species, and (2) 12S rRNA, COI, and Cyt b of 23 species (Table S1). To determine the optimal partitioning of the data, the best-fit partitioning scheme and the most appropriate nucleotide evolution model for each partition were implemented in PartitionFinder 2 using the greedy algorithm and Akaike information criterion (AICc) (Lanfear et al., 2017). The partitions and models are listed in Table S2. The BI method was performed using MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003). Two simultaneous runs (four Markov chains Monte Carlo chains) were conducted for 1.0 × 106 generations with independent models, and every 1,000 generations were sampled. Stationarity was considered to have been reached when the average standard deviation of the split frequencies was below 0.01. The first 25% of the sampled trees and the estimated parameters were discarded as burn-in. The remaining trees were used to calculate the consensus tree and Bayesian posterior probabilities. ML analysis was performed using RAxML 8.1.17 (Stamatakis, 2014). Branch support was assessed using a rapid bootstrapping set to terminate automatically with 10 runs and 1,000 replications using the GTRGAMMA model.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A