The experimental fMRI paradigm (Fig. 1) comprised a blocked design wherein active blocks with either the zero-back or the two-back task (‘WM-block’) were interleaved with passive blocks consisting of either emotionally neutral or emotionally negative pictures (‘EMO-block’). This resulted in four conditions: two-back followed by negative pictures (2E), two-back followed by neutral pictures (2N), zero-back followed by negative pictures (0E), and zero-back followed by neutral pictures (0N). The order of the blocks was randomized per participant, under the conditions that 1) the experiment started with a WM-block and 2) blocks were never immediately followed by the same type.
Study design: A) Interleaved active n-back blocks and passive emotional stimuli blocks. The effect of WM-blocks preceding emotional stimuli was assessed by subdividing the emotional stimuli into four conditions: neutral-after-0-back (0N), emotional-after-0-back (0E), neutral-after-2-back (2N), emotional-after-2-back (2E). B) The working memory (WM) blocks consisted of 15 trials lasting 2s each. The emotional images blocks (EMO) consisted of 8 trials lasting 3s each. Every condition was shown twice, resulting in 8 WM and 8 EMO-blocks randomly interleaved, which results in a total task duration of 8:53 min
The WM-blocks consisted of a standard 0-back and 2-back task (Cousijn et al., 2014; Supplementary Methods 1.2). During the emotional block, 64 pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Supplementary Materials 1.2) were shown (32 emotionally negative and 32 emotionally neutral; Fig. 1) (Lang et al., 2005). The percentage of correct responses in the n-back task were compared between conditions and groups. All participants performed a recognition task after the fMRI experiment to determine whether both groups paid equal attention to the images during the fMRI-task. Subsequently, participants performed a validation task, in which they rated the valence of all images using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) rating from one (‘negative’) to nine (‘positive’) (Lang, 1980) (Supplementary Materials 1.2–1.3).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.