Sample size calculation

TG Thomas Gargadennec
JO Jean-Ferréol Oilleau
BR Bertrand Rozec
NN Nicolas Nesseler
SL Sigismond Lasocki
EF Emmanuel Futier
JA Julien Amour
MD Michel Durand
AB Adrien Bougle
TK Thomas Kerforne
MC Maëlys Consigny
DE Dauphou Eddi
OH Olivier Huet
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

In three randomised controlled trials on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery, delirium incidence varied from 13.7% to 34.0%.18–20 Based on this literature, we hypothesised a delirium incidence of 25% in the population studied. In two of the three studies, the magnitude of the treatment effect was a 50% decrease of postoperative delirium and subsyndromal delirium.18 19 Therefore, a 50% decrease in incidence of delirium was chosen to remain in line with the previous publications. Using a one-sided alpha=0.05% and 90% power, a sample size of 332 is needed. Considering a loss-to-follow-up rate of 5%, we plan to enrol 348 patients.

A one-sided alpha was chosen because no publication reported any worsening of the patient’s outcome compared with placebo. A two-sided alpha estimate is more robust but requires a bigger sample size.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A