Descriptive, continuous data were described as median and interquartile range (IQR), while descriptive, categorical data were described as frequencies.
In the calculation of the diagnostic sensitivity of EUS-FNB, an intention-to-diagnose analysis was performed.
Fisher’s exact test was used in the proportional analysis of any factors with a potential impact on the sampling yield and biopsy quality of EUS-FNB.
Pearson’s test was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r-value) between the Ki-67 Index as in EUS-FNB samples and as in surgical specimens. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to identify any difference in the Ki-67 Index comparing EUS-FNB samples and their corresponding surgical specimens.
Cohen’s kappa value was calculated to describe the level of agreement comparing PanNET grading in EUS-FNB samples and PanNET grading in the corresponding surgical specimens. Both an intention-to-diagnose analysis and a per-protocol analysis was performed.
A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses. The statistical calculations and tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.