ask Ask a question
Favorite

Assuming that the expected benefit of the e-commerce company when choosing the nondifferential pricing strategy is U11, the expected benefit of the e-commerce company when choosing the differential pricing strategy is U12, and the average expected benefit of the e-commerce company is U1¯, which are defined as follows:

According to the Malthusian dynamic equation, the replication dynamic equation of the e-commerce company is obtained as follows:

The first partial derivative of F (x) for x is as follows:

Based on the stability theorem of differential equations, the e-commerce company implements the strategy of nondifferential pricing in the stable state must meet the conditions: F(x) = 0, and Fx′(x) < 0.

When r>r0, the stable strategy of the e-commerce company is nondifferential pricing; when r<r0, the stable strategy of the e-commerce company is differential pricing; when r=r0, the e-commerce company cannot determine the stable strategy. Where the threshold is as follows:

Assume H(r)=PnPdyΔP+y(M+Ie)[r+(1 − r)α]+(1 − y)rIe+zF, when y[Mα(M+Ie)] > 0, (∂H/∂r) > 0, then H (r) is considered to be an increasing function of r. When r>r0, H (r) > 0, F(x)|x=1=0, and Fx′(x)|x=1 < 0, so x = 1 has stability; When r<r0, H (r) < 0, F(x)|x=0=0, and Fx′(x)|x=0 < 0, so x = 0 has stability; when r=r0, H (r) = 0, F(x)=0, and Fx′(x)=0, so x is stable at all levels in the range of 0 to 1, that is, the company's strategy does not change over time, regardless of the proportion of company choosing to price differentially.

Proposition 1 states that the increase of the proportion of the government strict supervision to e-commerce company will change the stable strategy of e-commerce company from differential pricing to nondifferential pricing; Similarly, the decline of the proportion of the government strict supervision to e-commerce company will change the stable strategy of e-commerce company from nondifferential pricing to differential pricing. Therefore, the government's strict supervision for e-commerce company is essential, and the government should take measures to improve strict supervision for the e-commerce company.

Based on Proposition 1, the phase diagram of the strategy evolution of e-commerce company is shown in Figure 2.

Phase diagram of strategy evolution of e-commerce company.

Inference 1: with the increase of the value of Pn, M, Ie, F, and α, the e-commerce company is more inclined to implement the nondifferential pricing strategy, when other parameters remain unchanged. Similarly, with the increase of the value of Pd and ∆P, the e-commerce company is more inclined to implement the differential pricing strategy. It shows that the proportion of e-commerce company implementing nondifferential pricing strategy is directly proportional to the benefits of nondifferential pricing, the fines imposed by the government and platform on e-commerce company for differential pricing and the probability of consumers' discovery, and inversely proportional to the benefits of e-commerce company implementing differential pricing strategy.

Since r0=(Pd+yΔPPnαy(M+Ie) − zF/(1 − α)yM+(1 − αy)Ie), the volume of Vx1 in Figure 2 represents the proportion of nondifferential pricing by the e-commerce company, and the corresponding volume of Vx0 represents the proportion of differential pricing by the e-commerce company. When the value of Pn, M, Ie, F, and α gradually increases, the value of r0 will gradually decrease, and the volume of Vx1 will increase at this time, indicating that the proportion of e-commerce company to implement nondifferential pricing increases; When the value of Pd and ∆P gradually increases, the value of r0 will gradually increase, and the volume of Vx1 will decrease at this time, indicating that the proportion of e-commerce company to implement nondifferential pricing decreases.

Assuming that the expected benefit of the consumer when choosing loyalty strategy to e-commerce company is U21, the expected benefit of the consumer when choosing disloyalty strategy to e-commerce company is U22, and the average expected benefit of the consumer is U2¯, which are defined as follows:

According to the Malthusian dynamic equation, the replication dynamic equation of consumer is obtained as follows:

The first partial derivative of F (y) for y is as follows:

Based on the stability theorem of differential equations, consumer implements the strategy of loyalty in the stable state must meet the conditions: F(y) = 0, and Fy′(y) < 0.

When x>x0, the stable strategy of the consumer is loyalty; when x<x0, the stable strategy of the consumer is disloyalty; when x=x0, the consumer cannot determine the stable strategy. Where the threshold is as follows:

Assume H(x)=UlUd − (1 − xP+(1 − x)[M+(1 − r)αM] − (1 − x)(1 − r)Cc+(1 − x)z(1 − β)F, when M − ΔP+(1 − r)(αMCc)+z(1 − β)F > 0, (∂H/∂x) > 0, H (x) is considered to be an increasing function of x. When x>x0, H (x)> 0, F(y)|y=1=0, and Fy′(y)|y=1 < 0, so y = 1 has stability; When x<x0, H (x) < 0, F(y)|y=0=0, and Fy′(y)|y=0 < 0, so y = 0 has stability; When x=x0, H (x) = 0, F(y)=0, and Fy′(y)=0, so y is stable at all levels in the range of 0 to 1, that is, the consumer's strategy does not change over time, regardless of the proportion of consumer choosing to be loyal.

Proposition 2 states that the increase of the proportion of nondifferential pricing of e-commerce company will change the stable strategy of consumer from disloyalty to loyalty; Similarly, the decline of the proportion of nondifferential pricing of e-commerce company will change the stable strategy of consumer from loyalty to disloyalty. Therefore, e-commerce company should reduce the degree of difference in pricing for consumers and try to retain consumers.

Based on Proposition 2, the phase diagram of the strategy evolution of consumer is shown in Figure 3.

Phase diagram of strategy evolution of consumer.

Inference 2: with the increase of the value of Ul, M, F, α, and β, the consumer is more inclined to be loyalty strategy to the e-commerce company, when other parameters remain unchanged. Similarly, with the increase of the value of Ud, ∆P, and Cc, the consumer is more inclined to be disloyalty strategy to the e-commerce company. It shows that the proportion of consumer being loyalty strategy to e-commerce company is directly proportional to the utility obtained by the loyal consumer from purchasing goods, the fines imposed by the government and e-commerce platform for differential pricing of e-commerce company, and the probability of consumers' discovery, and inversely proportional to the utility obtained by the disloyal consumer in purchasing goods, the additional benefit obtained by the e-commerce company in implementing differential pricing, the proportion of fines imposed by the platform to the e-commerce company and the cost of consumer complaints.

Since x0=1 − (UlUdP+(1 − r)Cc − [1+(1 − r)α]M − z(1 − β)F), the volume of Vy1 in Figure 3 represents the proportion of loyalty to e-commerce company by the consumer, and the corresponding volume of Vy0 represents the proportion of disloyalty to e-commerce company by the consumer. When the value of Ul, M, Ie, F, and α gradually increases, the value of x0 will gradually decrease, and the volume of Vy1 will increase at this time, indicating that the proportion of loyalty to e-commerce company by the consumer increases; When the value of Ud, ∆P, β and Cc gradually increase, the value of x0 will gradually increase, and the volume of Vy1 will decrease at this time, indicating that the proportion of loyalty to e-commerce company by consumer decreases.

Assuming that the expected benefit of the e-commerce platform when choosing the information supervision strategy is U31, the expected benefit of the e-commerce platform when choosing the information nonsupervision strategy is U32, and the average expected benefit of the e-commerce platform is U3¯, which are defined as follows:

According to the Malthusian dynamic equation, the replication dynamic equation of e-commerce platform is obtained as follows:

The first partial derivative of F (z) for z is as follows:

Based on the stability theorem of differential equations, e-commerce platform implements the strategy of information supervision in the stable state must meet the conditions: F(z) = 0, and Fz′(z) <0.

When y>y0, the e-commerce platform will choose information supervision as the stable strategy; when y<y0, the e-commerce platform will choose information nonsupervision as the stable strategy; when y=y0, the e-commerce platform cannot determine the stable strategy. Where the threshold is as follows:

Assume H(y)=FCp+yTpxF − (1 − x)rIp − (1 − x)y(1 − r)Ip, when Tp − (1 − x)(1 − r)Ip > 0, (∂H/∂x) >0, H (y) is considered to be an increasing function of y. When y>y0, H (y)> 0, F(z)|z=1=0, and Fz′(z)|z=1 < 0, so z = 1 has stability; When y<y0, H (y) < 0, F(z)|z=0=0, and Fz′(z)|z=0 < 0, so z = 0 has stability; When z=z0, H (y) = 0, F(z)=0, and Fz′(z)=0, so z is stable at all levels in the range of 0 to 1, that is, the e-commerce platform's strategy does not change over time, regardless of the proportion of e-commerce platform choosing information supervision.

Proposition 3 states that the increase of the proportion of consumer loyalty will change the stable strategy of e-commerce platform from information nonsupervision to information supervision. Similarly, the decline of the proportion of consumer loyalty will change the stable strategy of e-commerce platform from information supervision to information nonsupervision. Therefore, if the consumer can be loyal to the e-commerce company in the platform, the platform will also actively supervise its subordinate company.

Based on Proposition 3, the phase diagram of the strategy evolution of the e-commerce platform is shown in Figure 4.

Phase diagram of strategy evolution of e-commerce platform.

Inference 3: with the increase of the value of F, β, and Tp, the e-commerce platform is more inclined to implement the information supervision strategy, when other parameters remain unchanged. Similarly, with the increase of the value of Cp and Ip, the e-commerce platform is more inclined to implement the information nonsupervision strategy. It shows that the proportion of e-commerce platform implementing information supervision strategy is directly proportional to the fines imposed by the platform for differential pricing of e-commerce company, the proportion of fines imposed by the e-commerce platform for differential pricing of e-commerce company, and the reputation value brought by the loyal consumer to the platform, and inversely proportional to the cost of the platform's information supervision on e-commerce company and the fines by government imposed on the platform for nonsupervision of e-commerce company information resulting in differential pricing.

Since y0=(Cp+(1 − x)rIp − (1 − x)βF/Tp − (1 − x)(1 − r)Ip), the volume of Vz1 in Figure 4 represents the proportion of information supervision of e-commerce company by the platform, and the corresponding volume of Vz0 represents the proportion of information nonsupervision by the platform. When the value of F, β, and Tp gradually increase, the value of y0 will gradually decrease, and the volume of Vz1 will increase at this time, indicating that the proportion of e-commerce platform to implement information supervision increases; When the value of Cp and Ip gradually increases, the value of y0 will gradually increase, and the volume of Vz1 will decrease at this time, indicating that the proportion of e-commerce platform to implement information supervision decreases.

Assuming that the expected benefit of government regulatory department when government implementing the strategy of strictly supervising is U41, the expected benefit of government regulatory department when government implementing the strategy of loosely supervising is U42, and the average expected benefit of the government regulatory department is U4¯, which are defined as follows:

According to the Malthusian dynamic equation, the replication dynamic equation of the government regulatory department is obtained as follows:

The first partial derivative of F (r) for r is as follows:

Based on the stability theorem of differential equations, government regulatory department implements the strategy of strictly supervising in the stable state must meet the conditions: F(r) = 0, and Fr′(r) < 0.

When z>z0, the government regulatory department will choose strict supervision as the stable strategy; when z<z0, the stable strategy of the government regulatory department will choose loose supervision as the stable strategy; when z=z0, the government regulatory department cannot determine the stable strategy. Where the threshold is as follows:

Assume H(z)=−Cg+xR+(1 − x)Ie+(1 − x)(1 − z)Ip+(1 − x)N − (1 − x)[Ie+(1 − z)Ip], when (∂H/∂x) < 0, H (z) is considered to be an increasing function of z. When z<z0, H (z)> 0, F(r)|r=1=0, and Fr′(r)|r=1 < 0, so r = 1 has stability; When z>z0, H (z) < 0, F(r)|r=0=0, and Fr′(r)|r=0 < 0, so r = 0 has stability; When z=z0, H (z) = 0, F(r)=0, and Fr′(r)=0, so z is stable at all levels in the range of 0 to 1, that is, the government regulatory department's strategy does not change over time, regardless of the proportion of government regulatory department choosing to strict supervision.

Proposition 4 states that the decline of the proportion of information supervision of e-commerce company by e-commerce platform will change the stable strategy of government regulatory department from loose supervision to strict supervision; Similarly, the increase of the proportion of information supervision of e-commerce company by e-commerce platform will change the stable strategy of government regulatory department from strictly supervising to loosely supervising. Therefore, the government's strict supervision on e-commerce company is the necessary measure under the unfavorable conditions of the e-commerce platform's information supervision on e-commerce company.

Based on Proposition 4, the phase diagram of strategy evolution of the government regulatory department is shown in Figure 5.

Phase diagram of strategy evolution of government regulatory department.

Inference 4: With the increase of the value of R, Ie, Ip, and N, the government regulatory department is more inclined to implement the strict supervision strategy, when other parameters remain unchanged. Similarly, with the increase of the value of Cg and α, the government is more inclined to implement the loose supervision strategy. It shows that the proportion of government regulatory department implementing strict supervision strategy is directly proportional to the social benefits obtained, the fines punished by the government on e-commerce company and platform, and the social reputation loss caused by differential pricing under the government's loose supervision, and inversely proportional to the cost for the government to strictly supervise and the proportion of consumer discovering differential pricing.

Since z0=1 − (CgxR − (1 − x)[(1 − αy)Ie+N]/(1 − x)(1 − αy)Ip), the volume of Vr1 in Figure 5 represents the proportion of strictly supervised by the government, and the corresponding volume of Vr0 represents the proportion of loosely supervised by government. When the value of R, Ie, Ip, and N gradually increases, the value of z0 will gradually increase, and the volume of Vr1 will increase at this time, indicating that the proportion of strict supervision by government regulatory department increases; When the value of Cg and α gradually increase, the value of z0 will gradually decrease, and the volume of Vr1 will decrease at this time, indicating that the proportion of strict supervision by government regulatory department increases decreases.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A