A preliminary screening study was carried out for determining the appropriate ranges of independent UAE process variables: ethanol concentration (X1), sonication time (X2), and leaf–solvent ratio (X3) on the basis of a literature review [13,22,23]. X1 was varied from 0 to 100% by keeping X2 and X3 fixed at 32 min and 0.23 g·mL−1, respectively. Similarly, X2 was changed within a range of 10–54 min, while both X1 and X3 were kept fixed at 50% and 0.23 g·mL−1, respectively. Similarly, X3 was varied from 0.148 to 0.313 g·mL−1, while X1 and X2 were subjected to fixing at defined levels of 50% and 32 min, respectively. The preliminary experimental results that are shown in Figure 1 revealed increases in the response variables (Y1: TEY, Y2: ST yield, and Y3: Reb-A yield) with corresponding rises in the input variables, and hence, were selected as the most influential parameters. All the UAE experimental runs were carried out in accordance with the specifications that were laid down by a 3–factor–5–level CCD. Moreover, all the independent process parameters were varied over 5 levels (−α, −1, 0, +1, +α) with the variables coding according to Equation (1):
Effect of X1 (ethanol concentration) on TEY (%) target response, (a) the effect of X1 (ethanol concentration) on ST and Reb-A yields (mg/g), (b) ST yield: sonication time effect on TEY (%) target response, (c) sonication time effect on ST and Reb-A yields (mg/g), (d) Leaf-to-solvent ratio effect on the TEY (%) response, (e) Leaf-to-solvent ratio effect on ST and Reb-A yields (mg/g) responses (f).
In Table 1, the description of the input UAE process variables with their particular experimental ranges is given, along with their units and coded notations (Equation (2))
where Y designates the target responses, whereas β0 denotes the constant coefficient. βi, βii, and βij are indicative of the regression coefficients pertaining to the UAE process variables corresponding to linear, quadratic, and interaction effects, respectively. The independent UAE process variables are presented by Xi and Xj, respectively, and ε depicts the error.
UAE process parameters with their particular experimental ranges and levels.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.