Secondary Data Analyses

EO Emily Olfson
JB Joseph Bloom
SB Sarah Bertelsen
JB John P Budde
NB Naomi Breslau
AB Andrew Brooks
RC Robert Culverhouse
GC Grace Chan
LC Li-Shiun Chen
DC David Chorlian
DD Danielle M Dick
HE Howard J Edenberg
SH Sarah Hartz
DH Dorothy Hatsukami
VH Victor M Hesselbrock
EJ Eric O Johnson
JK John R Kramer
SK Samuel Kuperman
JM Jacquelyn L Meyers
JJ John Nurnberger, Jr
BP Bernice Porjesz
NS Nancy L Saccone
MS Marc A Schuckit
JS Jerry Stitzel
JT Jay A Tischfield
JR John P Rice
AG Alison Goate
LB Laura J Bierut
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Secondary analyses were performed to further explore our primary findings. First, individuals were divided into slow and normal metabolizers using a cut-off of ≤0.85 on the metabolism metric as previously described (Chen et al., 2014). This cut-off captures the lowest quartile of metabolizers, and this dichotomous variable was used in logistic regression models of smoking behaviors. Second, since the majority of the COGA sample was recruited from families at high-risk for alcoholism, the primary analyses examining the continuous metabolism metric and smoking milestones were repeated with the covariate of lifetime DSM-IV alcoholism dependence. Third, after observing an association between the metabolism metric and the time to first cigarette dichotomous variable (>5 and ≤5 minutes), the 4 level variable of time to first cigarette after waking (>60, 31–60, 6–30, ≤5 minutes) was also investigated in cumulative logistic regression models. These analyses were performed to assess whether the continuous metabolism metric predicted response across the four ordinal categories.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A