2.1.3 Metabolomics Data Analysis

JS John W. Steele
YL Ying Linda Lin
NC Nellie Chen
BW Bogdan J. Wlodarczyk
QC Qiuying Chen
NA Nabeel Attarwala
MV Madhu Venkatesalu
RC Robert M. Cabrera
SG Steven S. Gross
RF Richard H. Finnell
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The raw data were analyzed using MassHunter Profinder 8.0 and MassProfiler Professional (MPP) 15.1 software (Agilent). Metabolite structures were identified using an in-house annotated metabolite database created using MassHunter PCDL manager 8.0 (Agilent) based on monoisotopic neutral masses (<5 ppm mass accuracy) and chromatographic retention times. A molecular formula generator (MFG) algorithm in MPP was used, based on weighted consideration of monoisotopic mass accuracy, isotope abundance ratios, and spacing between isotope peaks. A tentative compound ID was assigned when MFG scores concurred with the PCDL database for a given candidate molecule. Tentatively assigned molecules were verified based on a match of LC retention times and/or MS-MS fragmentation spectra for pure molecule standards contained in the in-house database. Common R packages such as omu (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/omu) and Metaboanalyst (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca) were used for data analysis and visualization, including hierarchical clustering, pathway enrichment analysis, principal component, and partial least squares-discriminant analyses. For analysis using Metaboanalyst, non-informative features were filtered out using the interquantile range method. Missing values were estimated feature-wise using a k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm. Samples were normalized by median, and the dataset was log-transformed and mean-centered.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A