The 10-tem LEAS11,13 asks participants to describe what they believe they and another individual would feel in each of 10 hypothetical scenarios. Freely written responses (typed into a web-based interface; http://eleastest.net/) are scored based solely on the words chosen to describe feelings (scoring is done automatically by computer software). For each scenario, a score of 0 is given to non-emotional words (e.g., confused); a score of 1 is given to words related to bodily sensations (e.g., “exhausted”); a score of 2 is given to words describing emotional actions (e.g., “hitting”) or simple valence distinctions (e.g., “pleasant”, “unpleasant”) that entail approach/avoidance; a score of 3 is given to single emotion concept terms (e.g., “happy,” “afraid”); and a score of 4 is given when at least 2 emotion concept terms are used in a single scenario. For each scenario, the self- and other-related responses are scored separately (i.e., values of 0–4). A “total” score is then given for each scenario, which reflects the higher of the self- and other-related scores. However, if a score of 4 is given for both self and other, a total score of 5 is given for that scenario, as long as the self- and other-related responses are differentiable (for more details see11).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.