Review Methods

DO Daniar Osmonov
AR Ahmed Ragheb
SW Sam Ward
GB Gideon Blecher
MF Marco Falcone
AS Armin Soave
RD Roland Dahlem
KR Koenraad van Renterghem
NC Nim Christopher
GH Georgios Hatzichristodoulou
MP Mirko Preto
GG Giulio Garaffa
MA Maarten Albersen
CB Carlo Bettocchi
GC Giovanni Corona
YR Yacov Reisman
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The panel provided statements on clinically relevant questions including patient's involvement in the decision process, indications for surgery, choice of the most suitable approach and management of patient expectations. A comparison of the different grafts used in patients who have undergone plaque incision and grafting (PIG) or partial plaque excision and grafting (PEG) has been carried out. The rates of postoperative complications with particular focus on sexual outcomes were analyzed. The statements were internally discussed and the level of evidence (LoE) was provided according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence criteria; moreover, the quality of evidence was graded by applying the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine recommendations.17

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A