2.2. Fermentation, Extraction, and Isolation

JY Jun-Jie Yu
YJ Ying-Xue Jin
SH Shan-Shan Huang
JH Juan He
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The fungus Bipolaris sp. was isolated from fresh and healthy stems of kiwifruit plants (Actinidia chinensis Planch., Actinidiaceae), which were collected from the Cangxi county of the Sichuan Province (GPS: N 31°12′, E 105°76′) in July 2018. Each fungus was obtained simultaneously from at least three different healthy tissues. The fungus was identified as one species of the genus Bipolaris by observing the morphological characteristics and analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. A living culture (internal number HFG-20180727-HJ32) has been deposited at the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, China.

This fungal strain was cultured on a potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at 24 °C for 10 days. The agar plugs were inoculated in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 100 mL potato dextrose media. Flask cultures were incubated at 28 °C on a rotary shaker at 160 rpm for two days as the seed culture. Four hundred 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 150 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB), were individually inoculated with 25 mL of seed culture and were incubated at 25 °C on a rotary shaker at 160 rpm for 25 days.

The cultures of Bipolaris sp. (60 L) were extracted four times by EtOAc to afford a crude extract (32.0 g) which was subjected to CC over silica gel eluted with a gradient of CHCl3-MeOH (a gradient from 1:0 to 0:1) to give six fractions, A–F. Fraction B (13.0 g) was fractionated by MPLC CC over RP-18 eluted with MeOH–H2O (from 10:90 to 100:0, v/v) to give twelve sub-fractions (B1–B12). Fraction B3 (1.2 g) was applied to Sephadex LH-20 eluting with CHCl3–MeOH (1:1, v/v) and was further purified by preparative HPLC with MeCN–H2O (19:81, v/v, 4.0 mL/min) to obtain compounds 9 (18.6 mg, retention time (tR) = 40 min), 18 (22.6 mg, tR = 15.8 min), 2 (3.3 mg, tR = 32 min), and 1 (5.4 mg, tR = 36 min). Fraction B5 (2.1 g) was separated by CC over silica gel with a gradient elution of the CHCl3–MeOH system (50:1→0:1) and was prepared by HPLC with MeCN–H2O (12:88, v/v, 4.0 mL/min) to obtain 3 (4.9 mg, tR = 36 min), 4 (14.4 mg, tR = 46 min), 17 (28.3 mg, tR = 43 min), and 5 (2.1 mg, tR = 40 min). Fraction B6 (1.8 g) was purified over Sephadex LH-20 eluted with MeOH to give four subfractions (B6.1–B6.4). Fraction B6.2 (210 mg) was purified using semipreparative HPLC with MeOH-H2O (28:72, v/v, 3.0 mL/min) to afford 8 (8.8 mg, tR = 17.8 min) and 7 (9.6 mg, tR = 21.1 min). Fraction B6.3 (170 mg) was purified by preparative HPLC with MeCN–H2O (23:77, v/v, 4 mL/min) to yield 6 (4.3 mg, 26 min). Fraction C (4.3 g) was separated by CC over silica gel with a gradient elution of PE-acetone (50:1→0:1) to afford subfractions C1–C8. Fraction C2 (340 mg) was purified by preparative HPLC with MeCN-H2O (55:45, v/v, 4 mL/min) to give 12 (10.3 mg, tR = 38 min), 13 (3.7 mg, tR = 39 min), 14 (3.1 mg, tR = 36 min) and 15 (3.4 mg, tR = 34 min). Fraction C5 (230 mg) was isolated by CC over Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) and was prepared by HPLC (32:68, v/v, 4 mL/min) to give 10 (3.7 mg, tR = 28 min), 11 (4.2 mg, tR = 29 min), and 16 (5.1 mg, tR = 24 min).

Bipolarisorokin A (1): colorless crystals; mp 145–148 °C; [α]20D + 67.8 (c 0.01, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 205 (3.30); IR (KBr) νmax 3360, 2947, 2833, 1651, 1454, 1114, 1031 cm−1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 251.16624 [M–H]+, (calculated for C15H23O3 251.16527).

1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR Spectroscopic Data for 13.

a Measured in CDCl3; b Measured in methanol-d4.

Bipolarisorokin B (2): colorless oil; [α]22D − 100.1 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 210 (3.23); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 275.16166 [M+Na]+, (calculated for C15H24O3Na+ 275.16177).

Bipolarisorokin C (3): colorless, needle-like crystals (MeOH); mp 135–138 °C; [α]22D − 21.8 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 265 (3.49) nm; 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, methanol-d4) data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 253.17971 [M+H]+ (calculated for C15H25O3+ 253.17982).

Bipolarisorokin D (4): colorless oil; [α]25D + 32.0 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 255 (3.65); 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, methanol-d4) data, see Table 2; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 275.16153 [M+Na]+ (calculated for C15H24NaO3+ 275.16177). Bipolarisorokin E (5): colorless oil; [α]25D − 22.7 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 210 (3.24); 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, methanol-d4) data, see Table 2; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 221.15529 [M–H] (calculated for C14H21O2 221.15470).

1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR Spectroscopic Data for 46.

a Measured in CDCl3; b Measured in methanol-d4.

Bipolarisorokin F (6): white powder; [α]20D − 3.3 (c 0.04, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 215 (3.72); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 2; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 225.18506 [M+H]+ (calculated for C14H25O2+ 225.18491).

Bipolarisorokin G (7): colorless oil; [α]20D + 17.2 (c 0.02, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 230 (3.21); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 3; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 275.20059 [M+H]+ (calculated for C18H27O2+ 275.20056).

1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR Spectroscopic Data for 79.

a Measured in CDCl3; b Measured in methanol-d4.

Bipolarisorokin H (8): colorless oil; [α]25D − 136.9 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 225 (3.93); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 3; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 277.17984 [M+H]+ (calculated for C17H25O3+ 277.17982).

Bipolarisorokin I (9): colorless crystals; mp 191–194 °C; [α]22D + 8.8 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 210 (3.46); 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, methanol-d4) data, see Table 3; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 251.16621 [M–H], (calculated for C21H23O3 251.16527).

Bipolarithone A (10): colorless oil; [α]23D + 136.0 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 245 (3.30); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 4; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 349.09143 [M+H]+, (calculated for C17H17O8+ 349.09179).

1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR Spectroscopic Data for 10 and 11.

a Measured in CDCl3; b Measured in methanol-d4.

Bipolarithone B (11): colorless oil; [α]23D − 24.2 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 245 (3.30); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 4; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 349.09157 [M+H]+, (calculated for C17H17O8+ 349.09179).

Bipolarithone C (12): colorless oil; [α]25D + 52.9 (c 0.5, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 245 (4.06); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 5; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 541.24310 [M+H]+, (calculated for C30H37O9+ 541.24321).

1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR Spectroscopic Data for 12 and 13.

a Measured in CDCl3; b Measured in methanol-d4.

Bipolarithone D (13): colorless oil; [α]25D + 10.2 (c 0.5, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 245 (3.88); 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) data, see Table 5; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 541.24316 [M+H]+, (calculated for C30H37O9+ 541.24321).

Crystal data for Cu_1_0m: C15H24O3, M = 252.34, a = 9.7038(6) Å, b = 13.7866(8) Å, c = 16.6333(10) Å, α = 95.329(3)°, β = 104.898(2)°, γ = 102.525(3)°, V = 2073.0(2) Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P 1, Z = 6, μ(Cu Kα) = 1.54178 mm−1, F(000) = 828, 82979 reflections measured, 16831 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0695). The final R1 values were 0.0437 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1047 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.0531 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1143 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.039. Flack parameter = −0.10(7). CCDC: 2124305. Available online: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 11 December 2021).

Crystal data for Cu_3_0m: C15H24O3, M = 252.34, a = 7.0044(5) Å, b = 10.1468(8) Å, c = 20.1433(14) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 90.00°, γ = 90.00°, V= 1431.63(18) Å3, T = 295(2) K, space group P 21 21 21, with Z = 4, μ(Cu Kα) = 1.54178 mm−1, F(000) = 552, 6263 reflections measured, 2527 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0500). The final R1 values were 0.0519 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1538 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.0719 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.2087 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.117. Flack parameter = −0.40(17). CCDC: 2124306. Available online: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 11 December 2021).

Crystal data for Cu_9_0m: C15H24O3, M = 252.34, a = 6.8634(2) Å, b = 15.0872(4) Å, c = 13.5156(3) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 90.4010(10)°, γ = 90.00°,V = 1399.50(6) Å3, T = 295(2) K, space group P 1 21 1, with Z = 4, μ(Cu Kα) = 1.54178 mm−1, F(000) = 552, 32232 reflections measured, 5982 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0279). The final R1 values were 0.0300 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.0808 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.0304 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.0812 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.057. Flack parameter = −0.01(3). CCDC: 2124307. Available online: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 11 December 2021).

Crystal data for Cu_17_0m: C14H24O2, M = 224.33, a = 13.6388(2) Å, b = 13.6388(2) Å, c = 13.0174(2) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 90.00°, γ = 90.00°, V = 2097.04(7) Å3, T = 296(2) K, space group P 31 2 1, with Z = 6, μ(Cu Kα) = 1.54178 mm−1, F(000) = 744, 39026 reflections measured, 3033 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0459). The final R1 values were 0.0353 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.0988 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.0366 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1003 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.047. Flack parameter =0.01(5). CCDC: 2126101. Available online: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 11 December 2021).

Crystal data for Cu_18_0m: C15H26O2, M = 238.36, a = 13.1977(2) Å, b = 13.1977(2) Å, c = 8.49040(10) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 90.00°, γ = 90.00°, V = 1478.85(5) Å3, T = 297(2) K, space group P 43, with Z = 4, μ(Cu Kα) = 1.54178 mm−1, F(000) = 528, 14568 reflections measured, 3063 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0269). The final R1 values were 0.0534 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1525 (I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.0541 (all data). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1539 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.051. Flack parameter =0.12(7). CCDC: 2126105. Available online: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 11 December 2021).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A