2.4.3. Discrimination and calibration

JN Ji Hae Nahm
HL Hye Sun Lee
HK Haeryoung Kim
SY Sun Young Yim
JS Ji-hyun Shin
JY Jeong Eun Yoo
SA Sang Hoon Ahn
JC Jin Sub Choi
JL Ju-Seog Lee
YP Young Nyun Park
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The predictive accuracy of the final model was assessed by discrimination evaluated by calculating the concordance index (Harrell’s C index)34 and measured as the time-dependent incremental area under the receiver operating characteristic curve Heagerty’s integrated AUC (iAUC)35 for the three models. Differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between the outcome and model were calculated using a bootstrapping method. To identify improvements in the predictive capability by adding IHC markers in the base model (histological parameters only), the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI)36,37 at 3 and 5 years were computed. Calibration draw to the agreement between observed outcomes and predictive probabilities, and a bootstrap method was used to reduce bias.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A