The final section of the questionnaire contained scales measuring participants’ risk perceptions which included “perceived severity”, “susceptibility of COVID-19 disease”, “perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine”, and their “intention to get COVID-19 vaccine”. The original questionnaire developed by Ling et al. (2019) was used in a previous study for flu vaccine with sufficient internal consistency. [52] Because influenza and COVID-19 are diseases with similar transmission routes and the vaccines are both newly developed without sufficient vaccination history, [53] we modified the questionnaire to evaluate the risk perception and intention of COVID-19 vaccination in our study. While information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine policy in Mongolia was not fully determined during the development of the questionnaire, we only picked a questionnaire regarding risk perception and vaccination intention for this study. In the current study. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.81 in our study.
The participants’ perceived severity of COVID-19 disease subscale contains three items designed to measure participants’ agreement regarding the three statements as (1) “COVID-19 can be a life-threatening illness”, (2) “The negative impact of COVID-19 is very severe”, and (3) “COVID-19 is a serious illness for someone like me.” Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). The three items were summed up to form a composite score and divided into “low” and “high” severity of COVID-19 disease groups by cut-off point as mean score.
Participants’ perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 disease was evaluated by the question: “Without a COVID-19 vaccine, I will be vulnerable to contract COVID-19 in the next COVID-19 wave”. Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 “strongly agree” to 1 “strongly disagree”. The scale was divided into “low” and “high” susceptibility to COVID-19 disease groups by cut-off point as the mean score for analysis.
Participants’ perceived efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine subscale contains three items intended to measure the participant’s agreement regarding the three statements as (1) “Vaccination is a very effective way to protect me against the COVID-19”, (2) “If I don’t get a COVID-19 vaccination I will be at risk of catching COVID-19 in the next COVID-19 wave”, and (3) “I’m sure that having a COVID-19 vaccine would be effective in reducing my personal risk of contracting COVID-19”. Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 5 “strongly agree” to 1” strongly disagree”. The three items were summed up to create a composite score and further divided into “low” and “high” groups by cut-off point as the mean score for analysis.
Participants’ intentions to get the COVID-19 vaccine were evaluated by the question: “I intend to have a COVID-19 vaccination”. Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 “strongly agree” to 1 “strongly disagree”. To analyze the contributing factors to the intention, we divided the score into “less” and “more” intention groups by the mean score.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.