Subjective health, health check-ups visited, tobacco smoking and diabetes were the chosen outcomes. All these variables were assessed in every year of the survey, with little or no missing observations. With the question “How would you evaluate your health?”, the participants were queried about their subjective health. Answers to this question were provided on a 5-point Likert scale (very good, good, average, bad, very bad). For logistic regression, the five possible answers were trichotomized in the categories good (very good or good), average, and bad (bad or very bad). The following question asked about health check-ups: “In the last three months have you seen a doctor for a medical check up, not because you were sick?”. Moreover, participants were asked whether they currently smoked tobacco and whether they had been diagnosed with diabetes. The last three questions could only be answered as yes or no.
Self-identified German nationality was considered the exposure and was assessed by the following open question: “What nationality do you consider yourself? I don’t necessarily have in mind the nationality in your passport.” The reported nationalities “German” and “German-Jew” were considered as German nationality. All other nationalities, including no reported nationality, were contained in the comparison group.
A conceptual framework was established with confounders and mediators. The ascertained confounders are described below. To have an even age distribution that nevertheless represented individual stages of life in a meaningful way, age groups were coded as follows: ≤19 years, 20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60–79 years, and ≥80 years. Four categories for place of residency were available from the RLMS (regional center, big cities, small town, village). For descriptive analyses, a binary classification was used in which regional centers and big cities were defined as urban and all other categories as rural. Regarding sex, the possible answers were either male or female. For descriptive analyses, the year of survey was categorized into 4 periods of equal length (1994–1999, 2000–2005, 2006–2011, and 2012–2018).
The ascertained mediators are depicted hereafter. We selected education, employment, and marital status as mediators because a minority status can be regarded as an influencing factor for these social determinants. A study in Sweden found that first- and second-generation immigrants experienced discrimination in regard to employment, describing how they were less likely to be invited for a job interview [29]. Additionally, children from immigrant families received high education degrees less frequently compared with native children [30], and it has been shown that a lower level of educational attainment is linked to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors [10]. In addition to economic aspects, social support from family, friends, or the wider community might be an important resource for minority populations to preserve their health [31]. Proxies for social support, such as living in a relationship or being married, are associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events [32,33,34].
In the RLMS data, six categories were available for the variable level of education. The categories were 0–6 grades of comprehensive school; unfinished secondary education 7–8 grades of school]; unfinished secondary education [7–8 grades of school] plus something else, secondary school diploma; vocational secondary education diploma; and higher education diploma and more. For descriptive statistics, the level of education was divided into three levels (non-completed secondary education, completed secondary education, and higher than secondary education) [35]. The employment status was measured by asking about the participants’ primary work at present. Categories of the RLMS data were currently working; on paid leave [maternity leave or taking care of a child under 3 years of age]; on another kind of paid leave; on unpaid leave; and not working. For descriptive analyses, employment was recoded into a variable with three categories (unemployed, paid or unpaid leave, and employed). Never married; in a registered marriage; living together and not registered; divorced and not remarried; widower or widow; registered but not living together; and married were the seven categories of the variable marital status. To describe frequency distributions of marital status, the seven categories were condensed into four (living alone, divorced or widowed, living together but not married, and living together and married). Smoking, diabetes, and subjective health were only considered mediators for the association of self-reported nationality with healthcare utilization. Subjective health was used as variable with the original five categories.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.